With truly lamentable results, our age, casting aside all
restraint in its search for the ultimate causes of things, frequently
pursues novelties so ardently that it rejects the legacy
of the human race. Thus it falls into very serious errors, which
are even more serious when they concern sacred authority,
the interpretation of Sacred Scripture, and the principal
mysteries of Faith. The fact that many Catholic writers also
go beyond the limits determined by the Fathers and the
Church herself is extremely regrettable. In the name of higher
knowledge and historical research (they say), they are looking
for that progress of dogmas which is, in reality, nothing but
the corruption of dogmas.
These errors are being daily spread among the faithful. Lest
they captivate the faithfuls' minds and corrupt the purity of
their faith. His Holiness, Pius X, by Divine Providence, Pope,
has decided that the chief errors should be noted and condemned
by the Office of this Holy Roman and Universal
Inquisition.
Therefore, after a very diligent investigation and consultation
with the Reverend Consultors, the Most Eminent and
Reverend Lord Cardinal, the General Inquisitors in matters of
faith and morals have judged the following propositions to be
condemned and proscribed. In fact, by this general decree,
they are condemned and proscribed.
1. The ecclesiastical law which prescribes that books concerning
the Divine Scriptures are subject to previous examination does
not apply to critical scholars and students of scientific exegesis of
the Old and New Testament.
CONDEMNED
2. The Church's interpretation of the Sacred Books is by
no means to be rejected; nevertheless, it is subject to the more
accurate judgment and correction of the exegetes.
CONDEMNED
3. From the ecclesiastical judgments and censures passed
against free and more scientific exegesis, one can conclude
that the Faith the Church proposes contradicts history and
that Catholic teaching cannot really be reconciled with the true
origins of the Christian religion.
CONDEMNED
4. Even by dogmatic definitions the Church's magisterium
cannot determine the genuine sense of the Sacred Scriptures.
CONDEMNED
5. Since the deposit of Faith contains only revealed truths,
the Church has no right to pass judgment on the assertions
of the human sciences.
CONDEMNED
6. The "Church learning" and the "Church teaching"
collaborate in such a way in defining truths that it only remains
for the "Church teaching" to sanction the opinions of
the "Church learning."
CONDEMNED
7. In proscribing errors, the Church cannot demand any
paternal assent from the faithful by which the judgments she
issues are to be embraced.
CONDEMNED
8. They are free from all blame who treat lightly the
condemnations passed by the Sacred Congregation of the
Index or by the Roman Congregations.
CONDEMNED
9. They display excessive simplicity or ignorance who
believe that God is really the author of the Sacred Scriptures.
CONDEMNED
10. The inspiration of the books of the Old Testament
consists in this: The Israelite writers handed down religious
doctrines under a peculiar aspect which was either little or
not at all known to the Gentiles.
CONDEMNED
11. Divine inspiration does not extend to all of Sacred
Scriptures so that it renders its parts, each and every one,
free from every error.
CONDEMNED
12. If he wishes to apply himself usefully to Biblical studies,
the exegete must first put aside all preconceived opinions
about the supernatural origin of Sacred Scripture and interpret
it the same as any other merely human document.
CONDEMNED
13. The Evangelists themselves, as well as the Christians
of the second and third generation, artificially arranged the
evangelical parables. In such a way they explained the scanty
fruit of the preaching of Christ among the Jews.
CONDEMNED
14. In many narrations the Evangelists recorded, not so
much things that are true, as things which, even though false,
they judged to be more profitable for their readers.
CONDEMNED
15. Until the time the canon was defined and constituted,
the Gospels were increased by additions and corrections.
Therefore there remained in them only a faint and uncertain
trace of the doctrine of Christ.
CONDEMNED
16. The narrations of John are not properly history, but a
mystical contemplation of the Gospel. The discourses contained
in his Gospel are theological meditations, lacking historical
truth concerning the mystery of salvation.
CONDEMNED
17. The fourth Gospel exaggerated miracles not only in
order that the extraordinary might stand out but also in order
that it might become more suitable for showing forth the work
and glory of the Word Incarnate.
CONDEMNED
18. John claims for himself the quality of witness concerning
Christ. In reality, however, he is only a distinguished
witness of the Christian life, or of the life of Christ in the
Church at the close of the first century.
CONDEMNED
19. Heterodox exegetes have expressed the true sense of the
Scriptures more faithfully than Catholic exegetes.
CONDEMNED
20. Revelation could be nothing else than the consciousness
man acquired of his relation to God.
CONDEMNED
21. Revelation, constituting the object of the Catholic faith,
was not completed with the Apostles.
CONDEMNED
22. The dogmas the Church holds out as revealed are not
truths which have fallen from heaven. They are an interpretation
of religious facts which the human mind has acquired by
laborious effort.
CONDEMNED
23. Opposition may, and actually does, exist between the
facts narrated in Sacred Scripture and the Church's dogmas
which rest on them. Thus the critic may reject as false facts
the Church holds as most certain.
CONDEMNED
24. The exegete who constructs premises from which it
follows that dogmas are historically false or doubtful is not
to be reproved as long as he does not directly deny the dogmas
themselves.
CONDEMNED
25. The assent of faith ultimately rests on a mass of
probabilities.
CONDEMNED
26. The dogmas of the Faith are to be held only according
to their practical sense; that is to say, as preceptive norms of
conduct and not as norms of believing.
CONDEMNED
27. The divinity of Jesus Christ is not proved from the
Gospels. It is a dogma which the Christian conscience has
derived from the notion of the Messias.
CONDEMNED
28. While He was exercising His ministry, Jesus did not
speak with the object of teaching He was Messias, nor did His
miracles tend to prove it.
CONDEMNED
29. It is permissible to grant that the Christ of history is
far inferior to the Christ Who is the object of faith.
CONDEMNED
30. In all the evangelical texts the name "Son of God" is
equivalent only to that of "Messias." It does not in the least
way signify that Christ is the true and natural Son of God.
CONDEMNED
31. The doctrine concerning Christ taught by Paul, John,
and the Councils of Nicaea, Ephesus and Chalcedon is not that
which Jesus taught but that which the Christian conscience
conceived concerning Jesus.
CONDEMNED
32. It is impossible to reconcile the natural sense of the
Gospel texts with the sense taught by our theologians
concerning the conscience and the infallible knowledge of
Jesus Christ.
CONDEMNED
33. Everyone who is not led by preconceived opinions can
readily see that either Jesus professed an error concerning
the immediate Messianic coming or the greater part of His
doctrine as contained in the Gospels is destitute of authenticity.
CONDEMNED
34. The critics can ascribe to Christ a knowledge without
limits only on a hypothesis which cannot be historically
conceived and which is repugnant to the moral sense. That
hypothesis is that Christ as man possessed the knowledge of
God and yet was unwilling to communicate the knowledge
of a great many things to His disciples and posterity.
CONDEMNED
35. Christ did not always possess the. consciousness of
His Messianic dignity.
CONDEMNED
36. The Resurrection of the Saviour is not properly a fact
of the historical order. It is a fact of merely the supernatural
order (neither demonstrated nor demonstrable) which the
Christian conscience gradually derived from other facts.
CONDEMNED
37. In the beginning, faith in the Resurrection of Christ
was not so much in the fact itself of the Resurrection as in
the immortal life of Christ with God.
CONDEMNED
38. The doctrine of the expiatory death of Christ is Pauline
and not evangelical.
CONDEMNED
39. The opinions concerning the origin of the Sacraments
which the Fathers of Trent held and which certainly influenced
their dogmatic canons are very different from
those which now rightly exist among historians who examine
Christianity.
CONDEMNED
40. The Sacraments had their origin in the fact that the
Apostles and their successors, swayed and moved by circumstances
and events, interpreted some idea and intention of
Christ.
CONDEMNED
41. The Sacraments are intended merely to recall to man's
mind the ever-beneficent presence of the Creator.
CONDEMNED
42. The Christian community imposed the necessity of
Baptism, adopted it as a necessary rite, and added to it the
obligation of the Christian profession.
CONDEMNED
43. The practice of administering Baptism to infants was
a disciplinary evolution, which became one of the causes why
the Sacrament was divided into two, namely. Baptism and
Penance.
CONDEMNED
44. There is nothing to prove that the rite of the Sacrament
of Confirmation was employed by the Apostles. The
formal distinction of the two Sacraments of Baptism and
Confirmation does not pertain to the history of primitive
Christianity.
CONDEMNED
45. Not everything which Paul narrates concerning the
institution of the Eucharist (I Cor. 11; 23-25) is, to be taken
historically.
CONDEMNED
46. In the primitive Church the concept of the Christian
sinner reconciled by the authority of the Church did not
exist. Only very slowly did the Church accustom herself to
this concept. As a matter of fact, even after Penance was
recognized as an institution of the Church, it was not called
a Sacrament since it would be held as a disgraceful Sacrament.
CONDEMNED
47. The words of the Lord, "Receive the Holy Spirit; whose
sins you shall forgive, they are forgiven them; and whose sins
you shall retain, they are retained" (John 20: 22-23), in no
way refer to the Sacrament of Penance, in spite of what it
pleased the Fathers of Trent to say.
CONDEMNED
48. In his Epistle (Ch. 5:14-15) James did not intend to
promulgate a Sacrament of Christ but only commend a pious
custom. If in this custom he happens to distinguish a means
of grace, it is not in that rigorous manner in which it was
taken by the theologians who laid down the notion and
number of the Sacraments.
CONDEMNED
49. When the Christian supper gradually assumed the
nature of a liturgical action those who customarily presided
over the supper acquired the sacerdotal character.
CONDEMNED
50. The elders who fulfilled the office of watching over the
gatherings of the faithful were instituted by the Apostles as
priests or bishops to provide for the necessary ordering of the
increasing communities and not properly for the perpetuation
of the Apostolic mission and power.
CONDEMNED
51. It is impossible that Matrimony could have become a
Sacrament of the new law until later in the Church since it
was necessary that a full theological explication of the doctrine
of grace and the Sacraments should first take place
before Matrimony should be held as a Sacrament.
CONDEMNED
52. It was far from the mind of Christ to found a Church
as a society which would continue on earth for a long course
of centuries. On the contrary, in the mind of Christ the
kingdom of heaven together with the end of the world was
about to come immediately.
CONDEMNED
53. The organic constitution of the Church is not immutable.
Like human society, Christian society is subject to
a perpetual evolution.
CONDEMNED
54. Dogmas, Sacraments and hierarchy, both their notion
and reality, are only interpretations and evolutions of the
Christian intelligence which have increased and perfected
by an external series of additions the little germ latent in
the Gospel.
CONDEMNED
55. Simon Peter never even suspected that Christ entrusted
the primacy in the Church to him.
CONDEMNED
56. The Roman Church became the head of all the
churches, not through the ordinance of Divine Providence,
but merely through political conditions.
CONDEMNED
57. The Church has shown that she is hostile to the progress
of the natural and theological sciences.
CONDEMNED
58. Truth is no more immutable than man himself, since
it evolved with him, in him, and through him.
CONDEMNED
59. Christ did not teach a determined body of doctrine
applicable to all times and all men, but rather inaugurated a
religious movement adapted or to be adapted to different
times and places.
CONDEMNED
60. Christian Doctrine was originally Judaic. Through
successive evolutions it became first Pauline, then Joannine,
finally Hellenic and universal.
CONDEMNED
61. It may be said without paradox that there is no chapter
of Scripture, from the first of Genesis to the last of the
Apocalypse, which contains a doctrine absolutely identical
with that which the Church teaches on the same matter. For
the same reason, therefore, no chapter of Scripture has the
same sense for the critic and the theologian.
CONDEMNED
62. The chief articles of the Apostles' Creed did not have
the same sense for the Christians of the first ages as they
have for the Christians of our time.
CONDEMNED
63. The Church shows that she is incapable of effectively
maintaining evangelical ethics since she obstinately clings to
immutable doctrines which cannot be reconciled with modem
progress.
CONDEMNED
64. Scientific progress demands that the concepts of Christian
doctrine concerning God, creation, revelation, the Person
of the Incarnate Word, and Redemption be readjusted.
CONDEMNED
65. Modern Catholicism can be reconciled with true science
only if it is transformed into a non-dogmatic Christianity;
that is to say, into a broad and liberal Protestantism.
CONDEMNED
The following Thursday, the fourth day of the same month
and year, all these matters were accurately reported to our
Most Holy Lord, Pope Pius X. His Holiness approved and
confirmed the decree of the Most Eminent Fathers and
ordered that each and every one of the above-listed propositions
be held by all as condemned and proscribed.
Peter Palombelli,
Notary of the Holy Roman and Universal Inquisition
http://catholicharboroffaithandmorals.com/